Home
News
Injustice in Ohio
Ohio death row inmate Tyrone Noling loses appeal in Portage County murder
There is evidence of innocence in this case: http://tyronenoling.com/
U.S. District Judge Donald Nugent denied an appeal by Ohio death row
inmate Tyrone Noling Friday and issued an order saying Noling - convicted
of gunning down an elderly couple - can't take his case to a higher
federal court.
Ohio public defenders will ask the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for
permission to continue Noling's legal battle to prove he didn't murder
Cora and Bearnhardt Hartig in Portage County in 1990.
No physical evidence linked Noling to the crime. Prosecutors relied on the
statements of three others who said they were with Noling the day of the
shootings. One of them, a teenager named Butch Wolcott, said he had seen
Noling running from the house, a smoking gun in his hand.
A jury sentenced Noling to death in 1996. A year later, Wolcott and the 2
others who placed Noling at the crime scene signed affidavits saying their
confessions were false, the result of pressure from prosecutors. Noling is
innocent, they said.
A succession of appellate judges, including Nugent, have refused to allow
Wolcott and the others to tell their stories in court.
In his 93-page opinion, Nugent wrote that to win his appeal, Noling "must
show that he is probably innocent" but had fallen short of that standard.
It was too late to argue the lack of physical evidence, Nugent wrote -
Noling's lawyers should have made that argument 10 years ago on direct
appeal.
The judge dismissed the co-defendants' recantations, saying the statements
weren't credible because they had "obvious interest in Noling's
exoneration."
One is in prison for his role in the murders and another is serving time
for an unrelated crime.
The judge didn't deal with the statements of Wolcott, who won immunity
from prosecutors for his testimony against Noling during the original
trial.
Wolcott had nothing to gain by admitting he lied on the stand and pointed
a finger at Noling, said Noling's attorney, Kelly Culshaw. "[Wolcott]
could have been charged with perjury," she said.
Judge Nugent wrote that to believe the co-defendants' affidavits "would
require this court to accept that they had absolutely no involvement in
the Hartig murders despite the fact that they were able to supply the
police with multiple details of how it occurred."
Wolcott and the others have maintained they were able to give painstaking
details about the crime only after an overzealous investigator coached
them so they would sound convincing on the stand.
Noling still has an appeal pending in state court.
(source: Plain Dealer)
Discuss this article on the forums. (2 posts)