Home
News
Ohio DP history
EVIDENCE FOR AND AGAINST THE DEATH PENALTY IN OHIO
"Both proponents and opponents of the death penalty cite the value of human life to bolster their positions. Opponents argue that because all human life is valuable, no one should be put to death. Proponents contend that those who take a human life must pay their debt to society."
Arguments in Support of Capital Punishment
The Death Penalty Is a Deterrent
People have taken widely-divergent stances on the death penalty per se and the
death penalty as a deterrent. It has been found that "intuition,", an
emotional feeling about capital punishment, determines individual reactions.
Interestingly enough, "if it were proved that [the death penalty] were or
were not a deterrent, a large portion of those favoring or not favoring [it] would
keep their basic pro or con positions."
Deterrence is often the primary reason given to support the retention of the
death penalty. Supporters argue that if the death penalty deters one criminal
from committing that final step towards murder, the penalty serves its purpose.
To bolster the argument, proponents cite two comprehensive studies published in
2002 and 2003, which sustain earlier findings that capital punishment
significantly deterred homicides in the United States.
The May 2002 study was conducted by the University of Colorado at Denver using 6,143 death sentences between 1977-1997
in the United States to investigate the impact of capital punishment
on homicide. The study compared the changes in the states' murder rates to the
probability of being executed for murder. The authors found not only that each
execution has a significant deterrent effect, but that each commutation of a
death sentence increases the number of homicides committed.
The 2003 study was conducted by researchers at Emory University and their "results suggest that capital
punishment has a strong deterrent effect. An increase in any of the three
probabilities - arrest, sentencing, or execution - tends to reduce the murder
rate. In particular, each execution results, on average, in 18 fewer murders -
with a margin of error of plus or minus 10." While early studies examined
only national or statewide data, the Emory group tracked changes in murder
rates and other data down to the county level. This study also controlled for
the effect of other factors on murder rates, including age, race, unemployment,
population density, other crime rates, and police-and prison-related variables.
In sum, "a better measure of the death penalty's deterrent effect can be
found in the experience over time of those States that have enacted
death-penalty statutes. Thus, to take the simplest example, the five States
showing the greatest decline in murder rates for the years 1995-2002 compared
to 1968-1976 - the years of no executions - are: Georgia, South Carolina, Florida, Delaware, and Texas. Each of these States has aggressively enforced
the death penalty since Furman."