Login Form

arrowHome arrow Patrick Swiney arrow Letter to Alabama Germany Partnership by Patrick Swiney

Letter to Alabama Germany Partnership by Patrick Swiney

Sunday, 31 August 2008

 

You may all recall the wonderful article by Amnesty International regarding Philip Alston's UN Report about Alabama. If not, that article is at the bottom of this email. I printed the Amnesty email, along with copies of two of the linked articles, and mailed them to Patrick. As a result of him reading this information, he wrote a letter to one of the companies in one of the linked articles. I want to share his letter with you and the rest of the world.

Love and Blessings, Sherry

 

 

25 July 2008
Patrick Swiney

154406 L20A

100 Warrior Lane

Bessemer, AL 35023

http://www.patrickswiney.com
Mr. Hajo Drees

Alabama Germany Partnership

500 Beacon Parkway West Re: Human Rights Concerns

Birmingham, Ala. 35209


Dear Mr. Drees:

I am writing to you in regard to an Associated Press article about: German companies being at home in Alabama. You stated: “It becomes a quality-of-life issue.” Drees said, “Germans are respected [in Alabama] you can feel it.”

I agree 100%. I am 64 years old and even as a small child anything made in Germany, or made by German people, meant the very highest of quality one could find anywhere in the world. I have also personally known many German people. I correspond with many and every single one – wonderful people. And yes, indeed, highly respected. But Mr. Dress, that’s exactly the very thing that disturbs me – so, so greatly.

Obviously, you yourself do not know, nor do you have any idea as to the “real” state of Alabama. If you knew the ugly “facts” no way would you recruit German Firms to locate in Alabama – no way! Here, you have the most Human Rights Abuses within the so-called free world. Please see parts of the United Nations Human Rights Council Special Rapporteur’s Report enclosed.

As stated, I’m a 64 year old man, have been in an Alabama prison on a wrongful conviction. No court in this state will give me a fair trial, even though we have scientific proof of actual innocence.

I do not expect you to believe me. As a matter of fact, I don’t want you to believe me. We have established a website http://www.patrickswiney.com. Every single thing pertaining to my case is right on that website. I would so greatly love for you to get a few German Law Schools to study my case. . . For all the World to see!

Also, my former Lead Attorney is in Bagdad, Iraq with the U.S. State Department (letter enclosed). He would welcome your contacting him on this matter. To be 100% truthful with you – I am a Political Prisoner – period!

Oddly, as I write, a group of your countrymen are trying to get your government to offer me political asylum, while at the very same time you’re over here [unwittingly] feeding the Beast.

I’m in very ill health, so in the near future it may be a non-event as far as me personally – but Sir, there are others.

But I do know for certain, that history shall be very cruel to those who support and feed this horrible beast. Mr. Drees, for the sake of your grandchildren, I so hope your family name shall not be associated with such horrors.

I simply ask that you search for Truth.

Respectfully, I am
Patrick Swiney
http://www.patrickswiney.com

Contact Info:
Wife: Sherry Swiney (205) 621-7699



Death Penalty

Alabama, Germany and the Death Penalty

death-penalty on June 30, 2008 at 2:52 PM

Today Philip Alston, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary and Arbitrary Executions concluded a two-week tour of the US by issuing a strong statement on a variety of issues, including the death penalty. Professor Alston visited two states, Alabama and Texas. The former, because it has the highest per capita execution rate, and the latter, because it has the most executions period.

Logical choices given his limited amount of time. His statement comes to unsurprising conclusions.

That, in Texas, he met with officials who "acknowledged that innocent people might have been executed."

That: "While some officials seem to consider due process rights as mere 'technicalities', the growing number of exonerations underscores that they are in fact indispensible safeguards against injustice in cases in which an error can be fatal."

That, in Alabama: "Government officials seem strikingly indifferent to the risk of executing innocent people and have a range of standard responses, most of which are characterized by a refusal to engage with the facts."

A less anticipated part of the statement concerns Alabama's cozy economic relationship with Germany:

"Alabama's systematic rejection of concerns that basic international standards are being violated sits oddly alongside the Government's determined and successful bid to attract foreign investment from the European Union in particular. Indeed, Alabama's largest export market in 2007 was Germany. It would thus be appropriate for Alabama to engage in a dialogue on due process concerns in its death penalty with the international community."

Of course, given their "refusal to engage with the facts", it is highly doubtful that Alabama would be the one to initiate a "dialogue on due process concerns in its death penalty with the international community." So it would probably be up to the international community to make the first move.

According to this AP article from about a month ago, "Alabama is now home to 50 German industries that state officials say employ upward of 12,000 people. Thousands more work in related companies." Major German investors include ThyssenKrupp, currently building "a mammoth, $3.7 billion steel plant near the Gulf of Mexico in Mobile County", as well as BASF AG, Degussa AG and DaimlerChrysler AG's Mercedes-Benz. Much more information on this interesting relationship can be had at the Alabama Germany Partnership.

Beyond this unexpected aside about EU and German investment, the lion's share of the Special Rapporteur's statement is devoted to death penalty flaws that are all too familiar to those of us who follow this issue regularly. The Rapporteur recommends, among other things, that problems related to "judicial independence and the absence of an adequate right to counsel should be addressed immediately"; and that "the federal courts should be able to review all substantive claims of injustice in capital cases." In far far too many cases, procedural technicalities cut off review of important issues, including questions of innocence, in capital cases, and the Rapporteur's recommendation seems reasonable:

"The best way forward would be for Congress to enact legislation permitting federal courts to review all issues in death penalty cases on the merits, with appropriate exceptions, such as where a defendant attempts to deliberately bypass state court procedures."

Yet, despite saying all the right things and making completely reasonable recommendations, the influence of this Special Rapporteur's visit, or indeed any United Nations criticism of the US death penalty system, will probably be seriously limited.

Which makes it even more interesting that today's statement drops such a strong hint about other possible avenues of influence.

Brian

DPAC

 Discuss this article on the forums. (8 posts)